David Griesing | Work Life Reward Author | Philadelphia

  • Blog
  • About
    • Biography
    • Teaching and Training
  • Book
    • WorkLifeReward
  • Newsletter Archive
  • Contact
You are here: Home / Archives for dog days

Short Stack of Interesting (dog-days edition)

August 19, 2026 By David Griesing Leave a Comment

It’s a testament to the discombobulation of too many August days that I outlined this newsletter on Friday, deleted all the underlying materials, and then forget to save these marching orders so I could pick up where I left off on Saturday—that is, yesterday.

So much for a turn-key newsletter.

But after rummaging around in my laptop’s trash can, I recovered the best bits, dusted them off & present them below.

Short Stack of Interesting is an occasional series that features stories, points of view & images that caught my attention & lingered there long enough that I began to suspect that you might find them interesting too.

1.    Waterfront Living in Holland

The image up top & those immediately below are of some of the homes that hundreds of Dutch families have built on strips of land that were left from centuries of peat mining. For many of us, living on or close to the water is something of a dream, particularly at this time of year. To my mind, these homes embody that dream more fully than most.

In the Loosdrecht Lakes region of the Netherlands, peat extraction for use as fuel began in the Middle Ages and expanded significantly from the 16th Century onwards. Thin embankments were left between the excavated trenches which filled with water over time. Today these proximities have been transformed into one of the Netherlands’ premier destinations for water sports (think sailing, kayaking and paddle-boarding) as well as waterfront living. Turning a centuries-old industrial landscape into a thriving community highlights the Dutch ability to adapt their “low (below sea-level) country” and to its ever-inundating waters in an enviable way.

2.    Nature Finds a Way

For some reason, my social media feeds have been filled with clips of giant tortoises being given back-scratches by zookeepers and pet (?) owners. I probably started watching them because I never once suspected that these incredible creatures could feel something like a scratch through their shells, but apparently they can, enjoying the sensation tremendously.

So I guess I shouldn’t have been surprised by another giant tortoise story, this one involving 2 from a species on the critically endangered list, improbably named “Mommy” and “Abrazzo,” who recently gave birth to sixteen (!!!) hatchlings at the Philadelphia Zoo despite the fact that both parents are estimated to be in the neighborhood of 100 years old, and Mommy is a first- time mom. The full story is told on the Zoo’s website.

These days, where even zoos have become controversial places for (say) keeping animals like elephants who need larger habitats in order to thrive, we sometimes forget that these institutions have also evolved, becoming incubators for creatures that face extinction in the wild. My hometown zoo has always been one of my favorite local destinations & this story was a reminder that I need to get over there to spend some quality time with one of its newest families. 

3.    Former Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy Talks About an Essential Book

As last year ended and this one began, the Wall Street Journal  invited an array of public and non-public figures to discuss the books they’d read in the previous year. I zoomed in on Kennedy’s comments because he played a unique role in the Supreme Court’s rulings over thirty years, from 1988 to 2018. During that era, Kennedy was the crucial “swing vote” in a vast majority of the Court’s 5-4 rulings on cases involving gay rights, abortion and the death penalty (where he sided with the so-called “liberal” bloc of justices), but even more frequently where he enabled the “conservative” bloc, as in Citizens United vs.the Federal Election Commission, where Kennedy wrote for the Court that prohibiting independent expenditures by corporations & unions violated the First Amendment’s protection of free speech in political contexts. Notwithstanding the outsized impact that Citizens United has had on the role that money plays in American politics, Kennedy’s voice was always a thoughtful & measured one, making his “outside” reading of more than a little interest to me. 

In his end of the year comments, Kennedy mentioned a single book,  Victor Davis Hanson’s “The End of Everything,” which he described as a “stunning account of four ancient wars that destroyed entire civilizations.” It chronicles how Thebes (in Ancient Greece), Carthage (during the rise of Rome), Constantinople (in 1453) and the Aztec empire (facing the Spanish conquistadors) weren’t undone by military power alone but also by “their gradual relinquishing of the civic virtues and adherence to the rule of law that had allowed them to flourish in the first place.” In other words, their civilizations had been undermined from within before any of them were felled by foreign invaders. 

In this light, Kennedy sees 21st Century America as a cautionary tale. 

We must not assume that liberty will perpetuate itself or that institutions will function without the trust and discipline of those they serve. The ancient world teaches us that decline rarely arrives suddenly. It accumulates in small abandonments of responsibility and mutual respect. ‘The End of Everything’ instructs us that the preservation of our democracy requires constant attention to the norms of civility, respect for lawful authority and a shared commitment to the dignity of every individual. We are not destined to follow in the paths of the societies Mr. Hanson writes about, nor are we destined to avoid them; it is our duty to take conscious steps to preserve freedom in our present day and secure it for generations yet to come.

A mid-term election in November or our next presidential election (even if both end well) won’t address the vulnerabilities that are undermining our way of life here today. Kennedy argues that only a wider and deeper revitalization of our basic commitments can reduce the civilizational risks that America faces.

4.    Shopping Plus History in a Striking New Supermarket

Traveling in Europe is a near constant reminder of a deeper human past than can easily be glimpsed closer to home. European’s also have a greater respect for their histories, something I’m always lamenting as Philadelphia tears down yet another historical building. 

So I was delighted by the story of a new supermarket in central Dublin that made multiple archeological discoveries during its initial excavation work. The developers discovered not only an 11th-century structure dating back to Ireland’s Viking era but also the remnants of an 18th-century Georgian theater. Instead of relocating their findings, they made the innovative decision to preserve the ruins in place, installing glass panels throughout the supermarket so shoppers can see their City’s deep historical roots while they move down the aisles.

When I visited Rome almost ten years ago, I spent part of my last day at the upscale Rinacente department store, where the basement level showcases the layers of Roman history that were uncovered while building that store. Unfortunately, the picture I took at the time of the ruins failed to capture the time-travel of moving from the top floor cafe through six floors of Italian fashion & design and down to the ancient streets below as successfully as this extraordinary approach in a Dublin supermarket.

5.    Who Gets My Collections When I’m Gone?

Baseball cards. Rocks. Shells. Paintings. Prints. Five of these. Seven of those. From the first collections that began when you bent down to fetch something that caught your eye at the beach or during a walk in the woods, sometimes the collecting bug never ends—even when you start wondering what will become of all of these accumulated treasures once you’re gone.

The Times did a thoughtful piece on the sad fate of most collections a few years back. It began with the following testimony from someone at an auction house who constantly hears the complaints of the unfortunate “heirs” who now have to dispose of all of these “treasures.”

More times than I can remember, a spouse or child has said to me, ‘If he wasn’t dead, I’d kill him all over again for leaving me with this mess.

So if you respect not only your inheritors but also the time & enjoyment you gained from your collecting, you’ll want to catalog your treasures in your will, as well as indicating what’s to be done with them once you’re gone.

It’s not really about doing it for the sake of the money, but it’s making sure that the responsible stewardship of your collection extends beyond your life.

That stewardship can mean different things for different people. For one guy who’s collected Superman memorabilia, he’ll trade his funeral (“a total waste of money”) for an invitation to his friends to browse his collection and take what they want.

If I were to die tomorrow, I would like to think that all of them would not mind having a Superman action figure of mine to keep to remember me by.

Others of us would simply prefer that our treasures not end up in a garage sale. Once again, it’s a matter of respect for the time & energy that we’ve spent on them. Collectors know the places where they’ve bought their favorite things & the folks who inherit our collections should be told about them too, as well as what items were worth when we purchased them & what they might fetch tomorrow. 

And if your rocks or shells will never be scooped up by a natural history museum, find a boy or girl who has the collector’s glint in their eyes and pass on your treasures for the enjoyment of a kindred spirit. When I was a kid, I got more than one treasure from collectors who’d identified an earlier version of themselves.

There are several ways to give your collections a respectable home when you’re gone—but as with so many other things, you’ll need to do some thinking about how you’ll be providing them with a new home. 

6.    The Friendliness of Objects

I’m going to drill a bit deeper into our relationship with things with an assist from Alan Jacobs & his Homebound Symphony newsletter. Some months ago, Jacobs elaborated upon philosopher Roger Scruton’s observations about traditions that we’ve maintained for centuries that involve repairing valued objects—traditions that are (sadly) fading away in our throw-away-the-old-one-just-buy-a-new-one culture. According to Scruton:

Repair was not so much a habit as an honoured custom. People respected the past of damaged things, restored them as though healing a child and looked on their handiwork with satisfaction. In the act of repair, the object was made anew, to occupy the social position of the broken one….

The custom of repair was not confined to the home. Every town, every village, had its cobbler, its carpenter, its wheelwright and its smith. In each community people supported repairers, who in tum supported things….

The truth is that repair, like every serious social activity, has its ethos, and when that ethos is lost, no amount of slap-dash labour can make up for it. The person who repairs must love the broken object, and must love also the process of repair and all that pertains to it.

(In a similar spirit, a post of mine from six years ago called “August’s Repair Shop,”  elaborated on how Japan embraces traditions of repairing treasured articles of clothing, reliable storage vessels & favorite cups or bowls through sashiko, staple repair & kintsugi—so there must be something about “restoration” and this time of year for me.)

Anyway, Jacobs goes on to make an interesting leap from repairing broken things out of the love for a “friend” to repairing much larger things (also out of friendship), like our education systems or our democracies.

I am greatly taken by the way Scruton frames the work of repair here, especially the idea that the impulse to repair arises from and is sustained by love — and that the particular form of love at work here is friendship. By repairing the things of this world we exhibit friendship towards them — and they become friends to us in return. 

People need things, and things need people.

The critical moment of their mutual support is the moment of breakdown…. We get angry at broken things, and want to throw them out — and this impulse often governs us even when the broken thing is not a car or a drain but democracy or education…

But what if we were to think not that our [democracy or our] education has betrayed us but rather that its need is greater than ours? What if we were to think that towards even something so vast and complex we have the obligations of friendship? 

And, if we meet those obligations, perhaps we could even enjoy the benefits of friendship.

(I wrote another related post more recently, “Our Work Includes Repairing the Commons of Public Life,” with “the commons” being spaces we hold in common—like parks or sidewalks—collectively sharing them in hopefully unselfish ways while benefitting from their use.)

Thinking about valued objects as well as traditions and even “our ways of life” as friends that we’re obliged to maintain & repair so that we can benefit from their use going forward may just be the beginning of the solution to some of our most existential problems today.

7.    The Great Green Wall of the Sahara

I’ll end today on an aspirational note with another story about the obligations & benefits of friendship–this time regarding people who are struggling to live a half a world away.

We hear a great deal about environmental calamities these days but (it sometimes seems) much less about human beings taking environmental responsibility for the places they call home.

I collect tribal art from African countries that are impacted by the Sahara so I follow developments in these countries, including recent reports of the more than 60,000 refugees from this region overwhelming the Spanish enclave of Ceuta last month, Russian mercenaries weakening the government of Mali, and violence from radical Islamic rebels that plagued eastern Nigeria earlier this year. But despite this region’s challenges (and those in the eastern Sahel, like the ongoing war in Sudan), what remains of the global community is also supporting an ambitious project to halt the march of the Sahara desert and reclaim arable land that’s being lost.

The U.N.-sponsored Green Great Wall initiative aims at restoring 100 million hectares of already degraded land, improving food security for residents, creating green jobs, and helping communities adapt to climate change.  In other words, it is rebuilding local ecosystems, with millions of hectares—a single hectare being just under 2 1/2 acres—already restored.

Pie in the sky?

While funding bottlenecks, high seedling mortality due to drought, and political instability have stalled the initiative at 20 to 30% completion since its inception in 2007, the initiative continues to advance in many areas, testifying to the resourcefulness of its managers at a time when the availability of farmable land may be the single most important factor in stabilizing local populations & averting an even graver immigration crisis than countries in the northern hemisphere have experienced thus far.  

The necessary response isn’t higher border walls and mass deportations that are turning wealthier countries into police states, but supporting projects like this one that enable local communities to sustain themselves so that those who live there aren’t desperate to leave, and reasonable border security can be restored by destination countries. 

We hear too much about the immigrant crack-downs & not nearly enough about the often heroic efforts that are being made today to address mass migration’s root causes. The Green Great Wall is one of them, and August may be the best time of year to contemplate the work of our friendlier angels instead of the blame that’s being asigned by our fallen ones.

This post was adapted from my August 16, 2026 newsletter. Newsletters are delivered to subscribers’ in-boxes every Sunday morning, and sometimes I post the content from one of them here, in lightly edited form. You can subscribe by leaving your email address in the column to the right.

Filed Under: *All Posts Tagged With: "The End of Everything", America as cautionary tale, August, dog days, endangered Galapagos tortoises, green wall of the sahara, Justice Anthony Kennedy, Loosdrecht Lake region Netherlands, respect for history in Dublin, short stack of interesting, the fate of personal collections, the friendliness of objects, traditions of repair

We’re All Acting Like Dogs Today

July 29, 2019 By David Griesing Leave a Comment

Saul Steinberg in the New Yorker, January 12, 1976

I recently read that dogs—through the imperatives of evolution—have developed expressions that invite positive interactions from their humans like “What a good boy” or a scratch behind the ears whenever, say, Wally looks me in the eye with a kind of urgency. There’s urgency all right, because he’s after something more than just my words or my touch. 
 
The reward that he really wants comes after this hoped-for interaction. It’s a little squirt of oxytocin, a hormone and neuropeptide that strengthens bonding by making me, and then both of us together, feel good about our connection.
 
As you might expect, Wally looks at me a lot when I’m working and I almost always respond. How could anyone refuse that face? Besides, it gives whatever workspace I’m in a positive charge that can linger all day.

Social media has also learned that “likes”—or almost any kind of interaction by other people (or machines) with our pictures and posts—produces similar oxytocin squirts in those who are doing the posting. We’re not just putting something out there; we’re after something that’s both measureable and satisfying in return.

Of course, the caution light flashes when social media users begin to crave bursts of chemical approval like Wally does, or “to feel rejected” when the “likes” aren’t coming fast enough. It’s a feedback loop “of craving to approval” that keeps us coming back for more. Will they like us at least as much, and maybe more than they did the last time I was here?  It’s the draw that always makes us stay on these social media platforms for longer than we want to and always keeps us coming back for more.

Social scientists have been telling us for years that craving approval for our contributions (along with not wanting to miss out) causes social media as well as cell-phone addiction in young people under 25. They are particularly susceptible to its lures because the pre-frontal cortex in their brains, the so-called seat of good judgment, is still developing. Of course, the ability to determine what’s good and bad for you is also underdeveloped in many older people too—I just never thought that included me.

So how I felt when I stopped my daily posting on Instagram three weeks ago came as a definite comeuppance. Until then I thought I had too much “good sense” to allow myself to be manipulated in these ways.

For the past 6 years, I’ve posted a photo on Instagram (or IG) almost every day. I told myself that regular picture-taking would make me look at the world more closely while, at the same time, making me better at capturing what I saw. It would give me a cache of visual memories about where I’d been and what I’d been doing, and posting on IG gave me a chance to share them with others.

In recent years, I’d regularly get around 50 “likes” for each photo along with upbeat comments from strangers in Yemen, Moscow and Beruit as well as from people I actually know. The volume and reach of approval wasn’t great by Rhianna standards, but as much as half of it would always come in the first few minutes after posting every day. I’d generally upload my images before getting out of bed in the morning, so for years now I’ve been starting my days with a series of “feel good” oxytocin bursts.

Of course, you know what happened next. My “cold turkey” from Instagram produced symptoms that felt exactly like withdrawal. It recalled the aftermath of cutting back on carbs a few years back or, after I was in the Coast Guard, nicotine. Noticeable. Physical. In the days that followed, I’d find myself repeatedly gazing over at my phone screen for notifications of likes or comments that were no longer coming. Or even worse, I’d explore identical-looking notifications for me to check other people’s pictures and stories, lures that felt like reminders of the boosts I was no longer getting. I felt “cut off” from something that had seemed both alive and necessary.

It’s one thing to read about social media or cell-phone addiction and accept it’s downsides as a mental exercise, quite another to feel withdrawal symptoms after quitting one of them.

Unlike the Food & Drug Administration, I did’t need anything more than my own clinical trial to tell me about the forces that were at play here, because at the same time that IG owner Mark Zuckerberg is engineering what feels like my addiction to his platform, he is also targeting me with ads for things (that I’m sorry to say) I realized I was wanting much more frequently. That’s because Instagram was learning all along what I was interested in whenever I hovered over one of its ads or followed an enticing link.

In other words, I’d been addicted to soften me up for buying stuff that IG had learned I’m likely to want in a retail exchange that effectively made both IG and Mark Zuckerberg the middleman in every sale. IG’s oxcytocin machine had turned me into a captive audience who’d been intentionally rendered susceptible to buying whatever IG was hawking. 

That seems both manipulative and underhanded to me.

It’s one thing to write about “loss of autonomy” to the on-line tech giants, it is another to have felt a measure of that loss.

So where does this leave me, or any of us?

How do lawmakers and regulators limit (or prevent) subtle but nonetheless real chemical dependency when it’s induced by a tech platform?

Is breaking the ad-based business models that turn so many of us into captive buyers even possible in a market system that has used advertising to stoke sales for more than 200 years? Can our consumer-oriented economy turn its back on what may be the most effective sales model ever invented?

To think that we are grappling with either of these questions today would be an illusion.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission has just fined Facebook (which is IG’s owner) for failing to implement and enforce narrow privacy policies that it had promised to implement and enforce years ago. The FTC also mandated oversight of Zuckerberg personally. Unlike the CEOs of other public companies, because he has effective ownership control of Facebook, his board of directors can’t really hold his feet to the fire. But neither the fine nor this new oversight mechanism challenge the company’s underlying business model, which is to (1) induce an oxytocin dependency in its users; (2) gather their personal data while they are feeling good by satisfying their cravings; (3) sell their personal data to advertisers; and (4) profit from the ads that are aimed at users who either don’t know or don’t care that they are being seduced in this way.

Recently announced antitrust investigations are also aimed at different problems. The Justice Department, FTC and Congress will be questioning the size of companies like Facebook and their dominance among competitors. One remedy might break Facebook into smaller pieces (like undoing it’s 2012 purchase of Instagram). However, these investigations are not about challenging a business model that induces dependency in its users, eavesdrops on their personal behavior both on-site and off of it, and then turns them into consumers of the products on its shelves. The best that can be hoped for is that some of these dominant platforms may be cut down to size and have some of their anti-competitive practices curtailed.  

Even the data-privacy initiatives that some are proposing are unlikely to change this business model. Their most likely result is that users who want to restrict access to, and use of, their personal information will have to pay for the privilege of utilizing Facebook or Google or migrate to new privacy-protecting platforms that will be coming on-line. I profiled one of them, called Solid, on this page a few weeks back.

Since it looks like we’ll be stuck in this brave new world for awhile, why does it matter that we’re being misused in this way?

Personal behavior has always been influenced by whatever “the Jones” were buying or doing next door (if you were desperate enough to keep up with them). In high school you changed what you were wearing or who you were hanging out with if you wanted to be seen as one of the cool kids.  Realizing that your hero, James Bond, is wearing an Omega watch might make you want to buy one too. But the influence to buy or to imitate that I’m describing here with Instagram feels new, different and more invasive, like we’ve entered the realm of science fiction.

Social media companies like Facebook and Instagram are using psychological power, that we’ve more or less given them, to remove some of the freedom in our choices so that they, in turn, can make Midas kingdoms of money off of us. And perhaps their best trick of all is that you only feel the ache of dependency that kept you in their rabbit holes—and how they conditioned you to respond once you were in them—after you decide to leave.

Saul Steinberg in the New Yorker, November 16, 1968

Maybe the scariest part of this was my knowing better, but acquiescing anyway, for all of those years. 
 
It’s particularly alarming given my belief that autonomy (along with generosity) are the most important qualities that I have.
 
I guess I had to feel what had happened to me in order to understand the subtlety of my addiction, the loss of freedom that my cravings for connection had induced, and my susceptibility to being used, against my will, by strangers for their own, very different purposes.
 
By delivering “warm and fuzzies” every day and getting me to stay for their commercials, Instagram became my small experience of mind control and Big Brother.
 
Over the past few weeks, I see people looking for something in their phones and think differently about what they’re doing. That’s because I still feel some of the need for what they may be looking for too.
 
It gives a whole new meaning to “the dog days” this summer.

+ + +

I’d love to hear from you if you’ve had a similar experience with a social network like Facebook or Instagram. If we don’t end up talking before then, I’ll see you next week.

This post was adapted from my July 28, 2019 newsletter. When you subscribe, a new newsletter/post will be delivered to your inbox every Sunday morning.

Filed Under: *All Posts, Building Your Values into Your Work, Daily Preparation, Using Humor Effectively, Work & Life Rewards Tagged With: addiction and withdrawal, addiction to social media, Big Brother, dog days, facebook, Instagram, manipulation, mind control, oxytocin, prevention, regulation, safeguards, Saul Steinberg, seat of good judgment, social media, social networks

About David

David Griesing (@worklifeward) writes from Philadelphia.

Read More →

Subscribe to my Newsletter

Join all the others who have new posts, recommendations and links to explore delivered to their inboxes every week. Please subscribe below.

David Griesing Twitter @worklifereward

My Forthcoming Book

WordLifeReward Book

Search this Site

Recent Posts

  • Short Stack of Interesting (dog-days edition) August 19, 2026
  • We Can’t Turn Our Backs on Coming Together July 6, 2026
  • Why Reveal Our Ugliest Truths? April 7, 2026
  • Here Comes the Sun March 4, 2026
  • Storytelling Our Way to a Nobler Time February 3, 2026

Follow Me

David Griesing Twitter @worklifereward

Copyright © 2026 David Griesing. All Rights Reserved.

  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy